Camilla is an androgynous monstrosity.

Camilla is an androgynous monstrosity.

• A. Susanna Morton Braund
• B. Bob Cowan
• C. Gildenhard and Henderson
• D. Philip Hardie

Answer: (C)

The idea here centers on how modern critics read Camilla’s gender and presence in the Aeneid. Some scholars argue that Camilla embodies a crossing of clear gender boundaries—an androgynous figure whose martial prowess and armor defy conventional female expectations, creating an unsettling, almost monstrous impression within the epic’s world. The pairing of Gildenhard and Henderson is the best fit because their work explicitly engages with Camilla in terms of gender ambiguity and the terrifying or “monstrous” implications of that ambiguity. Their analysis positions Camilla as a figure who destabilizes normative gender roles in Virgil’s poem, which is exactly the framing suggested by the statement. Other scholars are important voices in Virgil studies, but they do not foreground this particular interpretation with the same emphasis, making Gildenhard and Henderson the most apt reference for this claim.

The idea here centers on how modern critics read Camilla’s gender and presence in the Aeneid. Some scholars argue that Camilla embodies a crossing of clear gender boundaries—an androgynous figure whose martial prowess and armor defy conventional female expectations, creating an unsettling, almost monstrous impression within the epic’s world. The pairing of Gildenhard and Henderson is the best fit because their work explicitly engages with Camilla in terms of gender ambiguity and the terrifying or “monstrous” implications of that ambiguity. Their analysis positions Camilla as a figure who destabilizes normative gender roles in Virgil’s poem, which is exactly the framing suggested by the statement. Other scholars are important voices in Virgil studies, but they do not foreground this particular interpretation with the same emphasis, making Gildenhard and Henderson the most apt reference for this claim.